Early Years Outcomes 2015-2016
All schools make a judgement about the percentage of children who leave the Foundation Stage with a "good level of development" (GLD). These children have reached at least the expected level in the majority of aspects including reading, writing and number.
At Weyford Infant School and Nursery, there is a rapidly increasing percentage of children achieving a good level of development with 69% of children achieving that level in 2016 compared to 61.4% in 2015 and just 43.4% in 2014. The school is now achieving in line with the national average.
Adaptations have been made to the Early Years provision including more opportunities for children to follow their own interests in learning, increasing use of the outdoor environment, a more robust approach to the teaching of phonics, reading and mathematics and clearly shared expectations of the key writing skills children should be developing at this age.
Year 1 Phonics Test 2015-2016
βIn year 1, all children nationally undertake a phonics test in June. The children have to read 40 words using a phonics approach. Some of these words are real words and others are made up "alien" words to ensure that the children are using their phonics and not relying on sight vocabulary or memory. In order to achieve the expected level the children need to read at least 32 of these 40 words correctly.
Key Stage 1 Results 2015-2016
These are the teacher assessments made at the end of key stage 1 in year 2 when children are 6 or 7 years old. These assessments are teacher assessments based on knowledge of the children over the year; they are moderated with some national testing materials.
β2016 was the first year that children were assessed against the new curriculum. Judgements are now made as to whether a child is working at the expected level for their age or working beyond the expected levels for their age i.e. at greater depth. In order to be judged to be working at the expected level for their age, the child needs to have demonstrated that they have consistently met all the criteria at that level in each subject area.
βThe table below indicates the outcomes for 2015-2016 cohort which was for 42 children; therefore each child is worth a little more than 2%.
|
Number at at least expected level |
Percentage at at least expected level |
Number working at greater depth |
Percentage working at greater depth |
Reading |
28/42 |
67% |
12/42 |
29% |
Writing |
27/42 |
64% |
2/42 |
5% |
Mathematics |
27/42 |
64% |
5/42 |
12% |
Science |
33/42 |
79% |
9/42 |
21% |